There's a lot of gloom surrounding cameras and photography, in the past year or so. The devastating impact of smartphones on mass-market cameras seems to be being followed by a wave of AI-generated images that threaten to wash photography away as a creative form, if you believe those prognosticators with half-empty glasses. And yet it's hard to think of a year in which I've found it so difficult to choose a piece of gear to call out, because so many of them have been so good.
Having chosen Nikon's Z8 last year, the obvious decision this time round would be Canon's EOS R5 II: a camera that's almost unbelievably good at almost anything you might ask of it. The Nikon's Z6III's performance comes with a small footnote, but overall it's also sensationally capable and costs over 40% less.
On the lens side of things, Sony has made a usefully small full-frame F2.8 zoom and Sigma has developed what is essentially a full-frame version of its 18-35mm F1.8, creating the world's first AF F1.8 zoom for full-frame in the process. Then there's Fujifilm: not content with updating probably the best kit lens on the market (albeit with a loss of speed and reach at the long end counteracting the gain of width at the other), it's also replaced its premium standard zoom with a much smaller, lighter optic.
The Fujifilm 16-50mm F2.8 R LM WR II would probably be my choice in any other year. Its lightweight re-imagining meant it was small enough for me to take on a five-day hike across North Wales, and helped me assemble one of the best galleries I think I've ever shot.
"It's just exciting to see anyone introduce an enthusiast compact"And yet instead of any of these worthy winners, I'm going to choose a camera whose merits come with some appreciable caveats and that I'll spend much of this article appearing to criticize.
Let's get this straight out of the gate: in many respects the Leica D-Lux8 is refresh of a seven year old camera. And its price tag of $1599 lands somewhere between fanciful and absurd.
And yet, in an age when second-hand Panasonic LX3s often attract 40% of their original price on eBay, despite their wonky skin tones, outdated performance and 2008-vintage batteries, it's just exciting to see anyone introduce an enthusiast compact.
And while the D-Lux8 shares the bulk of its hardware with the LX100 II, it gains one of the most photo-focused user interfaces I've had the good fortune to use in the seventeen years I've been writing about cameras.
It also gains a much less distracting viewfinder, which I also appreciate, and its AF tracking, while not coming close to the standards of modern mirrorless cameras, is also improved.
There's a nagging doubt whenever I've used a recent D-Lux or LX100 of why it doesn't feel even more special, given its dial layout and aperture ring suggests it should feel like a smaller X100, but with a zoom. Personally I think the added lag of waiting for the motor-driven zoom to respond helps to distance your input from the camera's reaction. Or it could just be that the photos don't look as good, thanks to its less sharp lens, deeper minimum depth-of-field and absence of Film Simulation fairy dust.
But the 8's new interface is delightfully shutter speed and aperture focused. There aren't many custom buttons and you don't need a great many: it's a good-looking little camera that focuses your attention on taking photos. And that's something I've really missed.
Maybe there's still time for another blossoming of enthusiast compacts, now they're starting to find an audience, retrospectively. Or maybe I just need to accept that my own preferences don't match those of the wider market.
But even if the D-Lux8 doesn't herald a new Spring for the serious compact, it's not a bad note for the category to go out on. Price aside, it's a lovely little camera.